By Cheng Zhiliang
The United States said Monday it was filing a case on
intellectual property rights (IPR) against China with the World
Trade Organization (WTO), seeking quick success and instant
interests with a blind eye to facts and China's efforts.
The U.S. move is not a sensible one since it ignored facts
including the following aspects: IPR protection takes time
worldwide, not to say in the world's most populous country; China's
immense efforts in strengthening IPR protection; China's
willingness to cooperate in this regard.
Piracy is a worldwide issue that has been existing for decades
not only in developing countries but also in developed ones. It is
reported some American citizens came to China to produce
counterfeits and sell them in the United States, and it is also
common for global computer users to download protected software,
movies and music from the Internet for free.
Western countries took two centuries to achieve the current
level on IPR protection and it became obviously unfair to demand
that China, which became a WTO member in December 2001, accomplish
the mission within years, said Ma Xiushan, vice secretary general
of the China Intellectual Property Society.
Citing an example, Ma said that the US publishers paid no
royalty to British writer Charles Dickens in the early years after
the United States was founded.
Other countries need to give China credit for its hard and
effective work on copyright protection, said Geoffrey Yu, deputy
director general of the World Intellectual Property Organization,
at a forum in Beijing last year.
"I also realize it's a very big country with a huge population,
so the situation is complex and needs special attention," the
official added.
In fact, China has exerted immense efforts on IPR
protection.
China's top court lowered the threshold to prosecute people who
manufacture or sell counterfeit intellectual property products on
April 5, stipulating that anyone who manufactures 500 or more
counterfeit copies (discs) of software and audio-video products can
be prosecuted and faces a prison term of up to three years.
The threshold for a "serious IPR offender" was lowered from
5,000 counterfeit copies in 2004 to 2,500, and the punishment for a
serious IPR offender may be up to seven years in prison.
Earlier, more than 1.81 million pirated CDs and DVDs were seized
in a production factory in Guangzhou, capital of south China's
Guangdong Province on March 17, in the largest single crackdown on
CD and DVD piracy in the country's history.
Thirty production machines in 11 warehouses were confiscated and
13 people arrested.
It is a pity that Max Baucus, Democratic chairman of the US
Senate's powerful finance committee, said "rampant and large-scale
piracy and counterfeiting in China have persisted too long, and
China is not penalizing pirates and counterfeiters", according to a
report by AFP on Monday.
By filing against China with the WTO, the United States has
ignored the Chinese government's efforts and great achievements in
strengthening IPR protection and tightening enforcement of its
copyright laws, said Tian Lipu, commissioner of the Intellectual
Property Office of China on Tuesday.
The latest move reminds people of the incident in late March
when the U.S. government imposed penalty tariffs on the imports of
Chinese coated free sheet paper.
The U.S. decision altered a 23-year old bipartisan policy of not
applying the countervailing duty (CVD) law to China, which "goes
against the consensus reached between leaders of the two countries
to resolve contradictions through dialogue," responded the Chinese
government.
Global business activities have kept growing after China's entry
into the WTO, while trade frictions between China and some of its
trade partners, especially Europe and the United States, are also
on the rise, Chinese Commerce Minister Bo Xilai said in March.
China prefers to resort to consultations for the settlement of
trade frictions with its trade partners, Bo said.
The US filing on piracy against China with the WTO might also
cast a shadow on bilateral trade relations, while officials from
both sides are preparing for the second round of China-US Strategic
Economic Dialogue slated for May in Washington.
The last round of Dialogue ended last December in Beijing with
"a number of consensus", hailed by both sides.
(Xinhua News Agency April 11, 2007)