SCIO briefing on BRICS economic and financial cooperation

: 0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, August 31, 2017

Adjust font size:

Speakers:
Zhou Qiangwu, director general of the International Economics and Finance Institute of the Ministry of Finance;
Ye Fujing, director general of the Institute for International Economic Research of the National Development and Reform Commission

Chairperson:
Hu Kaihong, spokesperson of the State Council Information Office

Date:
August 31, 2017

China Review News Agency:

I wonder how are BRICS members going to enhance their cooperation to deal with trade protectionism from the United States?

Ye Fujing:

We are always opposed to trade protectionism, as it goes against the trend of economic globalization and the common interests of trading nations; it only meets the expectations of certain interest groups seeking to restrict competition through protection. Trade friction is nothing to worry about. Friction should be resolved through the WTO or by bilateral negotiations within the framework of international law, rather than through unilateral actions.

China adheres to trade openness based on a principle of modest and gradual progress, the process being in line with the national conditions and the development phase of each country. Due to differences in the development phase, China and the United States, indeed, have different industrial policies. However, it is not justifiable to embrace trade protectionism on the pretense of policy differences. We have always placed great emphasis on the protection of intellectual property rights, and are ready to safeguard and promote it on various fronts, including the BRICS mechanisms.

In addition, I'd like to talk about the trend of anti-globalization, of which trade protectionism is a key part. I think anti-globalization should neither be underestimated nor overestimated. Though the sentiments are still prevalent, its momentum has decreased. It has, for instance, receded through elections in France and the Netherlands. In the United States, those who have endorsed it have also regretted their action. Therefore, we should not overestimate its impact.

Anti-globalization is hardly constructive. People have realized that it cannot help improve their lives, but will only prove counter-productive in the future. Therefore, we can be optimistic about the trend of opposing trade protectionism and any moves towards anti-globalization.

Zhou Qiangwu:

The BRICS countries have always sought to promote globalization, which has benefited all of them. In the past two years, they have clearly voiced their support for globalization on various occasions. For example, at the G20 Summit in Hamburg, leaders from the BRICS countries issued a joint statement firmly supporting a rules-based, transparent, non-discriminatory, open and inclusive multilateral trading system, implementation and enforcement of existing WTO rules and commitments, and opposing protectionism. The BRICS countries have also made positive contribution in enlisting forces opposing protectionism as one of the outcomes of the G20 summit. We, the BRICS countries, speak with one voice in opposing protectionism, no matter whether this is under the framework of the G20, BRICS or the WTO.