Home / NPC & CPPCC Sessions 2009 / China.org.cn Exclusives Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Loopholes in food safety system: CPPCC member
Adjust font size:

Zhi Jianhua, a member of the 11th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference
Zhi Jianhua, a member of the 11th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference 

The new Food Safety Law is not the complete answer to loopholes in the regulatory structure, Zhi Jianhua, a member of the 11th National Committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) said at a group discussion, China Youth Daily reported on March 9.

"In China, milk production is controlled by agricultural departments, dairy products are overseen by quality control departments, but milk purchasing stations – the key link – come under nobody's jurisdiction," explained Zhi. "That was the precise cause of last year's Sanlu (baby milk) formula contamination scandal."

Zhi Shuping, deputy director of the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, agreed, saying: "Milk production encompasses many departments and is supervised and controlled by different organizations. The Sanlu scandal exposed the defects in milk testing standards and division of responsibilities between departments."

Xinhua reported that six babies died and 296,000 children became ill due to tainted milk in China last year.

Food adulteration

The Sanlu melamine scandal caused widespread panic and public complaint about food safety. CPPCC members questioned how melamine could find its way into baby formula while quality supervision and control departments insisted they had no knowledge of such adulteration.

"It is ridiculous," said Zhi Jianhua. "Previous testing standards excluded melamine. It is not a problem of standards. It is a problem of adulteration."

Wang Dingmian, an official from the China Dairy Association, said the two main threats to food safety were pollution of raw materials and deliberate adulteration.

"Incidents caused by pollution are relatively few in number. Most were caused by adulteration," said Wang who gave examples such as a fatal alcohol poisoning case in north China's Shanxi Province in February 1998, a milk formula case in 2004 which caused babies' heads to swell while their bodies wasted away, and the Sanlu scandal in 2008.

"Most major food safety incidents are caused by adulteration," he insisted.

Additives also a problem

Wang Dingmian, an official from the China Dairy Association
Wang Dingmian, an official from the China Dairy Association

Wang said benzoic acid content found in food production over the past years was also related to the testing standard.

"Benzoic acid is a prohibited additive. So the country hasn't tested for its presence in milk powder production over the past few years," said Wang. "When it was found in food, especially baby food, consumers were overwhelmed with panic and anger."

Wang stressed that the new Food Safety Law sets stricter and more scientific requirements for food additives. "Any use of the additives prohibited by state law will be regarded as illegal. However, there are tens of thousands of additives in use by the food industry. Without specific standards, there are bound to be illegal activities."

Zhi Jianhua agreed, saying: "The country lacks appropriate testing standards. The number of testing standards is over 4,000 in developed countries, while there are less than 300 in China. That's why illegal substances such as Sudan Red are found in food products and supervisory departments only find out after the events."

Faulty food processing

In addition to additives, faulty processing also threatens food safety, said Wang Dingmian. "For example, the popular 'flash processing technique' (pasteurization by flash heating) doubles the ash content and sugar acid in milk and endangers people's health, especially their kidneys and digestive systems.

"But the hazardous materials are not detected by existing product testing. The state doesn't have any rules or regulations in this regard. Some enterprises are still using the technique and thus pose a big threat to food safety."

No department responsible for milk purchasing stations

Reacting to Zhi Jianhua's remark on the chaos in China's system of milk purchasing stations, Wang readily agreed.

"There is no specific department responsible for the supervision and control of the quality of milk sources, and this has a vital influence on food safety," he said.

(China.org.cn by Li Jingrong, March 10, 2009)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Milk scandal prompts revision of draft food safety law
- Health Ministry gears up for food safety monitoring
- Efforts to implement food safety law
- Chinese Health Ministry to lead implementation of food safety law
- Food safety a top concern of lawmakers, advisors
- China to set up central food safety commission
- Draft law on food safety to undergo 4th reading
Questions and Answers More
Q: What kind of law is there in place to protect pandas?
A: In order to put the protection of giant pandas and other wildlife under the law, the Chinese government put the protection of rare animals and plants into the Constitution.
Useful Info
- Who's Who in China's Leadership
- State Structure
- China's Political System
- China's Legislative System
- China's Judicial System
- Mapping out 11th Five-Year Guidelines
Links
- Chinese Embassies
- International Department, Central Committee of CPC
- State Organs Work Committee of CPC
- United Front Work Department, Central Committee of CPC