Dichotomy of govt & people's income
0 
This year's Government Work Report shows China's GDP reached 33.5 trillion yuan ($4.9 trillion) in 2009, up 8.7 percent from 2008. The fiscal (budget) revenue topped 6.85 trillion yuan (just over $1 trillion), up 11.7 percent. And the urban per capita disposable income was 17,170 yuan ($2,515), an increase of 9.8 percent, while the rural per capita net income was 5,153 yuan ($754.9), up 8.3 percent.
China's 2009 fiscal revenue of 6.85 trillion yuan was equal to the year's total disposable income of 400 million urban residents. It was equal to the entire net income of 1.33 billion farmers, too. The budget revenue, however, does not include the 1.5 trillion yuan ($189 billion) income from land transfer, let alone the profits of the innumerable State-owned enterprises (SOEs) and the income accrued from selling State-owned assets (SOAs).
The country's fiscal revenue in 2008 was equivalent to the income of 390 million urban residents or the net income of 1.29 billion farmers that year. In contrast, the revenue in 2002 was equal to the income of 250 million urban residents or 760 million farmers, and the 1996 revenue was equal to the income of 150 million urban residents, or 380 million farmers.
From the statistics, we see that since 1995, the basic distribution layout of national income between the government and civilians has not changed. Instead, it has continued to increase for the government - even during 2008 and 2009 when the economy suffered because of the global financial crisis. The growth rate of fiscal revenue has been higher than the GDP and residents' income growth, which is inconsistent with the 17th Congress of the Communist Party of China's objective to adjust the income distribution structure.
So, why has China's fiscal revenue kept soaring despite the impact of the global financial crisis?
First, the government's control over SOAs and land is responsible for the lower private share of the national income. The difficulty China faces in boosting domestic demand is related with State ownership of enterprises and assets and the role the government plays in the economy. In a society where the majority of the property (including land) is owned by the State - irrespective of how much profit SOEs make or how much land prices appreciate - ordinary people cannot share the income from assets because most of it goes to the government.
Second, the income level of Chinese people is low - relatively lower than their counterparts in other countries. But the tax rate is not. Because of the lack of a sound social security network, unemployment insurance, social welfare projects, and inadequate expenditure on healthcare and education most Chinese have to save money for emergencies and are thus left with little money to spend.
Go to Forum >>0 Comments