US military report damages ties
0 
In recent years, a repeated theme in the report is that the military power balance has already leaned (and will continue to lean) toward the mainland. When cross-Straits relations are improving, the DOD report continues to stress the possibility of military conflict. One cannot help getting the impression that the US is seeking excuses to sell more arms to Taiwan.
The recent report expresses dissatisfaction over China's suspension of military exchanges, stating that arms sales to Taiwan is a long-held policy which the US will continue to adopt. The underlying logic seems to be: Why cannot China get used to US selling arms to Taiwan, for it has been doing it for more than 30 years? Does the US really think it can make a virtue out of a wrongdoing simply by doing it for 30 years? And that the victim should be expected to accept it?
The DOD report analyzes subjects such as the security situation in the Taiwan Straits, the Chinese PLA's size and capabilities, the development of operational doctrine, the advanced technologies the PLA has acquired or developed to boost its capabilities, its foreign military contacts and so on. In the analysis, accusations against China and its military abound. One of them is that China's rapid economic growth has helped to resource and finance the modernization of the military, but there exist uncertainties that "could divert China from a peaceful pathway", so the US must keep an eye on the development of the PLA's capabilities. The strong ideological overtone in the report reflects the deep-rooted doubts held by the US over the PLA, fundamentally affecting the development of Sino-US military relations.
Another frequent accusation is lack of transparency. In fact, China has made its military affairs more transparent by issuing biannual Defense White Papers, releasing information regularly through the Defense Ministry's information office and holding news conferences. Military transparency will continue to increase as a result of deepening reform, but not as a result of external pressure.
The report alleges that China's military development will affect the balance, security and stability in the Asia-Pacific region, or even the global military balance of power. The PLA justifiably opposes the deliberately slanted "China military threat" theory. As a country with a vast territory and diversified security requirements, China has to develop its military to meet its security needs. Any sovereign country has the right to enhance its defense and the Chinese military takes it as its responsibility.
The report also says the PLA's capabilities could provide it with "a force capable of conducting any range of military operations in Asia well beyond Taiwan". What is more, it alleges that since the PLA could operate with "anti-access" and "area-denial" capabilities in the Western Pacific, beyond the first "island chain", it poses a threat to the US.
"Anti-access" capabilities aim at "access control". A fundamental question is: What kind of a scenario does the US have in mind when it talks about "access assurance" within the first and second island chains? It is known that the US had made an ambiguous defense commitment to Taiwan. As long as that commitment exists, whatever capabilities the PLA develops cannot be considered as "beyond Taiwan".
To sum up, issuing an annual report on the Chinese military is an outdated practice that is detrimental to mutual understanding and trust, to sustained and reliable military to military relations and to the overall Sino-US strategic relationship. The Chinese government, the PLA and the Chinese people will continue to protest such a report.
The author is a major general and senior researcher at the Academy of Military Science of the PLA.
Go to Forum >>0 Comments