One Hugo Award does not a sci-fi culture make
- By Yang Xingdong
0 Comment(s)
Print
E-mail China Daily, August 27, 2015
Sci-fi writing, in a sense, has played a role in scientific exploration. Be it the Three Laws of Robotics, described by Isaac Asimov, or the Star Wars series, still regarded by many as the best sci-fi production, science fiction, as an exploration tool, has given rise to a powerful sci-fi culture in the United States. Thanks to this culture, science has not only been attracting youths, but also inspiring and/or influencing them to become scientists.
In comparison, and despite Liu winning this year's Hugo Award, we in China are still far from building a sci-fi culture. A literary genre cannot become popular if its readership remains small. A quick browse through online literature websites most popular in China would show the younger generations loves fantasy novels the most. Moreover, there are hardly any film or TV works based on Chinese sci-fi writing, and the one or two that have been failed to attract viewers were poorly conceived and executed.
In a society where the majority remains averse to sci-fi works, people will lack the passion for science and the urge to become scientists, which is detrimental to scientific research and innovation.
Therefore, we should see the panorama beyond individual success in the field of science fiction despite celebrating the success of Liu. Science fiction could gain wider attention and spread quickly if good works are produced in Chinese. But this is a tough task considering that the only existing platform for sci-fi literature and discussion in China is the Sci-fi Literature magazine.
It is important to spread awareness about science fiction and, in particular, direct youths' attention to sci-fi writing to create the right atmosphere for the healthy development of this wonderful literary genre. Only by doing so can we produce excellent sci-fi novelists like Liu and take forward the cause of science.
The article was first published on gmw.cn
Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)