Home · Weather · Forum · Learning Chinese · Jobs · Shopping
Search This Site
China | International | Business | Government | Environment | Olympics/Sports | Travel/Living in China | Culture/Entertainment | Books & Magazines | Health
Home / Business / News Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Trademark Body Sued in Latest Wahaha-Danone Twist
Adjust font size:

The legal wrangle between Danone and Wahaha has spread beyond the two companies to the nation's trademark authority.

Hangzhou Wahaha Foods Co, one of five joint ventures set up by the two firms, has sued the Beijing-based State Trademark Bureau over what it claims was "improper administrative behavior" in 1996 and 1997.

Hangzhou Wahaha Foods is 51 percent-owned by French food giant Danone Groupe SA, with the rest controlled by China's largest drinks producer Wahaha Group.

The Beijing No 1 Intermediate People's Court told China Daily on Friday that Wahaha Foods has demanded the trademark bureau rescind its rejection of applications to transfer the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures because it did not issue a written notice or give a reason for its decisions at the time. The court has accepted the case.

A spokesman with the trademark bureau said on Friday that it has yet to be notified of the legal action by the court. Danone declined to comment on the matter.

Danone, the world's largest yogurt maker, signed an agreement with Wahaha in 1996 that required the transfer of the Wahaha brand from the Chinese company to the joint ventures.

Under the contract, the Chinese company was barred from making products that compete with those produced by the joint ventures, or from using the Wahaha brand without Danone's consent.

But the two parties are divided on the validity of the agreement after Wahaha Group opposed an acquisition proposal from Danone to take 51 percent of non-joint ventures set up by the Chinese side.

Zong Qinghou, founder of Wahaha Group, claims the transfer was not properly approved by the authorities, citing a reply from the State Trademark Bureau, which twice rejected applications for the transfer of the Wahaha brand in 1996 and 1997.

Wahaha claims Danone was aware of the situation and that the two sides had joined forces to get around the rules.

Danone initially said Wahaha had not applied properly for the transfer of the brand, for which Danone paid Wahaha Group 100 million yuan.

(China Daily September 1, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Username   Password   Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Tingyi Surpasses Wahaha in Mineral Water Sales
- Danone-Wahaha Joint Venture Sales Plummet
- Danone Seeks Lawsuit Against Zong Qinghou
- Lawyers Divided over Wahaha Deal
- Wahaha in Troubled Waters
- Wahaha-Danone Feud Worsens with New Lawsuit
- Danone, Wahaha Trade Jabs
- Wahaha to File Counterclaim Against Danone
Most Viewed >>
-China set to hit the brakes on rising yuan
-Power to resume shortly in worst-hit area by snow
-Macao's gaming market expands further
-Online operators are on top of the game
-Insurance firms set to stump up billions

May 15-17, Shanghai Women's Forum Asia
Dec. 12-13 Beijing China-US Strategic Economic Dialogue
Nov. 27-28 Beijing China-EU Summit

- Output of Major Industrial Products
- Investment by Various Sectors
- Foreign Direct Investment by Country or Region
- National Price Index
- Value of Major Commodity Import
- Money Supply
- Exchange Rate and Foreign Exchange Reserve
- What does the China-Pakistan Free Trade Agreement cover?
- How to Set up a Foreign Capital Enterprise in China?
- How Does the VAT Works in China?
- How Much RMB or Foreign Currency Can Be Physically Carried Out of or Into China?
- What Is the Electrical Fitting in China?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback

Copyright © All Rights Reserved E-mail: Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP证 040089号