--- SEARCH ---
WEATHER
CHINA
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
GOVERNMENT
EDUCATION
ENVIRONMENT
CULTURE
WOMEN
BOOKS
SPORTS
HEALTH
ENTERTAINMENT
Living in China
Archaeology
Film
Learning Chinese
China Town
Chinese Suppliers
Exchange Rates
Hotel Service
China Calendar
Telephone and
Postal Codes


Hot Links
China Development Gateway
Chinese Embassies
Info
FedEx
China Post
China Air Express
Hospitals in China
Chinese Embassies
Foreign Embassies
China
Construction Bank
People's
Bank of China
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China
Travel Agencies
China Travel Service
China International Travel Service
Beijing Youth Travel Service
Beijing Xinhua Tours
Links
China Tibet Tour
China Tours
Ctrip
China National Tourism Administration

Manufacturers, Exporters, Wholesalers - Global trade starts here.
Court Rules Against Travel Agency

An international travel agency was ordered to return a 100,000 yuan (US$12,346) deposit to a customer as it couldn't provide evidence to back up its contention that it had already repaid the deposit.

 

Travel agencies often ask customers heading abroad to put down a large cash deposit, to prevent people from heading abroad as part of a group tour and then illegally staying in the foreign country. When customers return to China, they get their deposit back.

 

On April 19, a man surnamed Liang paid a 100,000 yuan deposit to the Shanghai Peace International Travel Agency ahead of a trip to Australia. The travel agency gave Liang a receipt, which clarified that he would get the money back if he returned to China on his scheduled flight.

 

Just before Liang left for Australia, an employee of the travel agency surnamed Yan called him and asked to take back the receipt to make business records.

 

Liang asked Yan to write "the receipt has been handed back without returning the deposit" on the receipt and kept a copy.

 

After Liang returned from Australia in August, the travel agency refused to give his deposit back, however, saying that it had already returned the money to Liang.

 

Liang had to file a lawsuit to get his money back.

 

The travel agency told the court that Liang didn't have the original receipt, which proves he had received his deposit back. It said the copied receipt Liang provided to the court proves nothing, as he could have written it out himself.

 

The agency also said it couldn't find the original receipt since it had returned the money.

 

To prove its opinion, the agency offered a bill to show Yan had drawn 100,000 yuan from the agency to return to Liang.

 

The court ruled the travel agency is responsible for proving it had returned the deposit, which it failed to do.

 

So the court supported Liang's request and ordered the agency to pay him back in full.

 

(Shanghai Daily December 26, 2005)

 

 

NZ to Improve Chinese Visitor Experience
Online Tourism Operation Calls for Customer Service
Big-scale Outbound Tourism Groups Develop Rapidly
Harbin-bound Biz Travel Normal But No Tour Groups
Sharp Discounts to Attract Tourists
Print This Page
|
Email This Page
About Us SiteMap Feedback
Copyright © China Internet Information Center. All Rights Reserved
E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000